- An open records lawsuit against former Wisconsin Supreme Court Chief Justice Patience Roggensack was dismissed after she provided records of her work investigating the possible impeachment of a sitting justice.
- Records did not reveal the advice she gave to Republican Assembly Speaker Robin Vos regarding the impeachment of Justice Janet Protasiewicz.
- The liberal watchdog group American Oversight filed the lawsuit against Roggensack, alleging a violation of the state’s open meetings law.
An open records lawsuit against former Wisconsin Supreme Court Chief Justice Patience Roggensack was dismissed Tuesday after Roggensack turned over all records she had related to her work investigating possible impeachment of a sitting justice.
None of the records Roggensack produced earlier this month shed any light on the impeachment advice she actually gave to Republican Assembly Speaker Robin Vos. Vos has said he spoke with Roggensack on the phone about impeachment of Justice Janet Protasiewicz and he has refused to say what her advice was. Roggensack has also not said what she told Vos.
Two other former justices Vos tapped for recommendations, David Prosser and Jon Wilcox, both advised against impeachment.
The liberal watchdog group American Oversight sued Vos, Prosser, Wilcox and Roggensack to get all of the records related to the possible impeachment. The group also alleged that the three former justices had broken the state’s open meetings law.
Wisconsin State Supreme Court Justice Patience Roggensack and other members gather for Governor Scott Walker’s state budget address at the Wisconsin State Capitol in Madison, Wis. An open records lawsuit against Roggensack was dismissed on Dec. 19, 2023. (AP Photo/Wisconsin State Journal, John Hart, File)
Dane County Circuit Judge Frank Remington in November dismissed the open meetings allegation, saying American Oversight filed its claim prematurely and should have given the district attorney time to decide whether to launch his own lawsuit. Dane County District Attorney Ismael Ozanne decided against bringing charges.
Remington had previously dismissed the open records allegations against Prosser and Wilcox after they produced records. In November, he gave Roggensack 30 days to turn over whatever records she had. In a filing with the court on Dec. 8, Roggensack said she had no responsive records beyond what had already been made public.
Her attorney, Bob Shumaker, confirmed that again in court on Tuesday.
American Oversight’s attorney Ben Sparks agreed to drop the case against her and the judge dismissed it.
The open records claim against Vos remains. His attorney, Matthew Fernholz, said Tuesday that Vos has already produced all of the records he has. Vos in November released about 20,000 pages of documents. The judge set a status hearing for Jan. 25.
FORMER WI SUPREME COURT JUSTICE REFUSES TO NAME THOSE INVOLVED IN PROTASIEWICZ IMPEACHMENT PUSH
Vos originally said he was considering impeachment if Protasiewicz did not recuse herself from the redistricting case. She did not recuse. Vos did not move to impeach her, following the advice against impeachment from the former justices. But now he’s suggesting he may attempt to impeach her if she does not rule in favor of upholding the current Republican-drawn maps.
The Wisconsin Constitution reserves impeachment for “corrupt conduct in office, or for crimes and misdemeanors.”
Republicans have argued Protasiewicz has pre-judged the case based on comments she made during the campaign calling the current maps “unfair” and “rigged.”
Protasiewicz, in her decision not to recuse from the case, said that while stating her opinion about the maps, she never made a promise or pledge about how she would rule on the case.
The court heard the redistricting case in November that could result in new maps being in place before the 2024 election. The court is expected to issue a ruling soon.